One of DNA’s elegant features is that the nucleotide bases are linked together with hydrogen bonds. Unlike their name implies, hydrogen bonds aren’t really chemical bonds at all. Instead, they are very strong attractions that exist between a hydrogen atom on one molecule and another atom (typically oxygen or nitrogen) on another molecule. Because hydrogen bonds are not true chemical bonds, they are not nearly as strong as chemical bonds. As a result, they can be “broken” with only a small amount of energy.
It turns out that this is the perfect design, because in order for DNA to code for proteins, the double helix must “open up” to expose the nucleotide bases. To do this, the link between the nucleotide bases must be broken. If the nucleotide bases were held together with chemical bonds, it would take a lot of energy to break the link, and that energy could easily damage the other bonds in DNA. Since the nucleotide bases are linked with hydrogen bonds, however, it takes only a small amount of energy to break the link. As a result, DNA can “open up” very easily, and the rest of the molecule is not harmed when that happens.
Watson and Crick determined all this, including exactly where the hydrogen bonds formed. Not surprisingly, the way in which the links form is called Watson-Crick pairing. Well, it turns out that there is another way the nucleotide bases can pair up, and a recent study shows that this is yet another amazing design feature of DNA.
Ten years after Watson and Crick proposed their model, Karst Hoogsteen was trying to confirm how the nucleotide bases linked together by studying adenine and thymine in solution. However, he found that they linked together in a different way. The way they linked together in his experiment is called, not surprisingly, Hoogsteen pairing.1 The difference between the two can be seen by the following illustration, which shows the hydrogen bonds with dotted lines:
Notice the difference. The nucleotide base adenine (A) is “flipped” in Hoogsteen pairing as compared to Watson-Crick pairing. While this doesn’t look very different, remember that the nucleotide bases are connected to the DNA backbone. One nucleotide base is connected to one helix, and the other is connected to the other helix. If I flip one of those nucleotide bases, that’s going to actually change the shape of that portion of the DNA!
Well, it turns out that the majority of nucleotide bases in DNA link together with Watson-Crick pairing. However, there are a few that link together with Hoogsteen pairing. It has been thought for quite some time that Hoogsteen pairing only occurs in DNA when it is either damaged or bound to some other molecule (like a protein or a drug). A recent study, however, shows that this is not the case. In fact, Hoogsteen pairing seems to be a part of DNA’s design.
Evgenia Nikolova and colleagues used some advanced nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques to study Hoogsteen pairing, and they found that it happens routinely in DNA. Although it happens only about 1% of the time, they show that it is actually functional. They end up referring to such pairing as an “excited state” for DNA.2 Thus, far from being an indication of damage or external binding, it seems to be a means by which DNA increases it complexity so as to store more information. The authors state that their observations imply
that the DNA double helix intrinsically codes for excited state Hoogsteen base pairs as a means of expanding its structural complexity beyond that which can be achieved based on Watson–Crick base-pairing.
In other words, Hoogsteen pairing gives DNA yet another way to store information! If this study is confirmed, then, there is yet another layer of complexity to DNA, which up until now has been completely unknown.
The more I study God’s handiwork, the more I stand in awe of Him!
1. Albert L. Lehninger, David Lee Nelson, and Michael M. Cox, Principles of Biochemistry, Fourth Edition, (W. H. Freeman, 1998), p. 286.
Return to Text