One Common Ediacaran Was Probably an Animal

A fossil similar to the one in which cholesterol remnants were found. (click for credit)

Several years ago, I wrote about the enigmatic fossils found in Ediacaran rock. Most scientists think such rocks are 635-540 million years old, and the fossils found in them have been the source of much controversy. Some paleontologists think they were “primitive” animals, some think they were lichens, some think they were fungi, some think they were giant protozoa, and some think that many of them aren’t even fossils. Well, based on some recent research, one Ediacaran fossil (Dickinsonia – an example is shown above) was most likely an animal.

The research was done by a team of scientists from Australia, Russia, and Germany. They collected Dickinsonia fossils from Ediacaran rock found on a cliff near the White Sea in Russia. This rock is thought to be 558 million years old. They found a thin layer of organic film on top of the fossils, and they chemically analyzed that film. They found cholestane, which is a chemical remnant of cholesterol. It is important to note that they didn’t find cholesterol itself. They found a decay product that indicates the one-time presence of cholesterol.

Why is this important? Cholesterol is a common component of animal cells, but significant amounts of it are not found in lichen, protozoa, or fungi. Thus, the one-time presence of cholesterol indicates that these fossils were animals. But couldn’t the cholestane be contamination? That’s a possibility, so the researchers chemically analyzed the rocks surrounding the fossils. In those rocks, they found little cholestane. Instead, they found the remnants of steroids that are commonly found in algae. So the cholestane is definitely associated with the fossils themselves and is probably not the result of contamination.

If a large number of the Ediacaran fossils end up being classified as animals, I think that will add to the long, long list of problems with flagellate-to-philosopher evolution. Since these fossils are supposed to have come before the better-known fossils found in the Cambrian, they would represent either the animal ancestors of the Cambrian organisms or some evolutionary offshoot that came from those animal ancestors. Either way, evolutionists are now faced with the task of trying to figure out some fairly close evolutionary relationship between the Ediacaran organisms and the Cambrian organisms. Given that these two sets of fossils are so radically different from one another, I suspect that will be a daunting task!

5 Comments

  1. John D says:

    The title of the article in my main stream media news feed seemed to have a slightly different tone –

    “Animals did exist before the so called Cambrian explosion!!!”

    Great use of imagery, I can almost see the fundamentalist prodding stick.

    1. Jay Wile says:

      I suppose some see this as a sign of hope, but as I said, I think it is easier to understand from an evolutionary perspective if the Ediacaran biota are not animals.

  2. Sj says:

    Even if the cholesterol itself was not preserved, is it logical that the decay products could be preserved for 558 million years? Are the decay products organic compounds?

    1. Jay Wile says:

      The decay products are organic compounds, but they are pretty simple ones. I don’t know of specific calculations on the lifetime of cholestane, but I suspect it is very high. It’s the proteins and other components of soft tissue that shouldn’t be able to survive for millions of years. Those large biomolecules decay spontaneously over time, most calculations indicating within tens of thousands of years even in very favorable conditions.

  3. CJL says:

    One difficulty for evolution after another. People really are out of excuses to continue to hang on to their beliefs regarding evolution. Then again, I’ve never known a cherished belief that went away easily.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: